Bo, I think with a multi pro 3000 scanner, 2 1/4 tech pan neg and an epson printer, you will be able to get sharp enough prints even Austin would like. I do have a few tech pan negatives I've scanned on my Agfa T2500 (2500 DPI Optical) that are exceptionally sharp. Your minolta should do better, it's much more recent technology, and 3000 DPI to boot. a 20x24 print should be a piece of cake. jerry > Quote you: > "Hope your scanner can take advantage" > End Qoute! > > That's the problem. I wish I had more money! > The Minolta Multi Pro $3000 scanner can not take advantage of it > fully out - but I assure you - it's *enought*! > > However for some some extra $'s I can have it drum scanned "outside"! > So far I manage A2 I think, but as I have not seen your D60 result in > real I'm not sure! > > But I believe you as well as Austin! > *We* have all our different standards. > *And* using those standards, (without to much theory), we can express > ourself in different ways. > Some call it tweaking, I think. > It's good if one can't see the tweaking at all - that is an art in > itself! > > This is like TV - go on You and Austin, I kind of like it! > After this the air might be cleaner. > (And indeed afterwards the US don't have to sign that Kyoto > agreement...because of this....however don't blow the ozone whole > further, it's now filled with "bouquet"??) > > <smile> > > Fiat Lux! > Bo > Sweden > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson > <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > > Bo, > > > > I would think Tech Pan and a Hassy neg would be good enough for ANY > > body. > > > > Hope your scanner can take advantage of that combination! > > > > Except Austin, of course. :+) > > > > sm7bxd wrote: > > > > > > OK Jerry, > > > > > > Thanks for your advice, I'll keep to Techn Pan and Technodol, > > > until I can afford that Sinar back for my Hassy. Or any other > digital > > > camera at about 22 Meg. > > > > > > Until it happens, yes I will be happy with Techn Pan and my MF > camera, > > > It's good enought for me. > > > > > > I can also get fairly good with that outfit, I hope as good as > yours? > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.