Digital BW, The Print

Any idea what this puppy might sell for when it's available???

Tom O'Connell


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "sm7bxd" <sm7bxd@y...> 
wrote:
> Hallo Austin and Jerry,
> 
> Yes, everything has it's limits.
> What about the limit of this:
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02090601sinar22mp.asp
> It's a 22 Megapixel back for MF?
> 
> But of cause it's not like a D60.  
> 
> Something for us to test and take interest instead of the D60?
> I have the body and lenses - I just need this back to test if it's 
> better than Technical Pan and Technodol on MF???
> 
> What do you think? I think I would get rather good prints on a 1290 
> B/W with this back. But I think Techn. Pan and some Technodol cost 
me 
> less?
> 
> Everything is a matter of taste, religion, technics and money!
> Don't ever try to convert anybody - everyone has a right to has 
> his/her opinion and religion. As long one is pieceful - that is!
> 
> By the way - try Minolta Multi Pro with VueScan - trash the Minolta 
> software for negative film! (A new Minolta software is to be 
expected 
> in some weeks though..)
> 
> 
> Fiat Lux!
> Bo
> Sweden
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" 
> <darkroom@i...> wrote:
> > 
> > > This will be my last dissuasion with you about which is better, 
> digital
> > > or film. :(
> > 
> > Jerry,
> > 
> > No one is arguing with you which is better, people are simply 
> discussing the
> > LIMITS of both.  I know this may come as a surprise to you 
(that's 
> sarcasm),
> > but digital does have limits...  It's important to understand the 
> limits of
> > any medium you are using, that is if you want to make the most 
out 
> of that
> > medium...and I'm sure there are those that simply do it right 
> without
> > knowing squat...but that ain't me.
> > 
> > Austin