I am about to put a cat in the pigeon house, I have been shooting professionally now for 30 years the last 3 on digital. The results that I have with my Leaf Volarie 6 mp 3 shot chip used in a 1 shot mode on a Fuji 6x8 i.e. giving me B/W capture only just blow film out of the water, I have a tonal range and quality of image that I can not even come close to in the wet darkroom. I recently upgraded to a Sinar 44 16 mp chip and the results are even better now. I have been a strong supporter of the tradition print but now 95% my images are done digitally. The best I can get is 8 stops from film I get 11 from the chip. If you cant get a good shot from a contrasty subject then you are using the wrong curve at capture. Bruce --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "akivisuals" <akivisuals@y...> wrote: > Does anyone here have input as far as shooting digitally vs. > scanning transparencies or negatives? I have heard that you > can get more latitude with digital. Also, you don't have to worry > about the whole scanning process and paying for good drum > scans if you shoot digitally if the camera is capable enough. Do > most people in this group scan trannies or shoot digitally? What > level camera do you need to be able to print good 16x20's or > bigger? How big can you print with a 6 megapixel Canon 1D, > D60, D30, or Fuji S2? I'm curious to see what people are using > to create their images. Thanks! > > Andy
Message
Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-14 by Bruce Alexander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.