Austin You have no concept of what sort of back I am using if your ill informed answer is any thing to go by. It is not a scanning back as you stated but real time capture, Yes it is tethered to a computer but a laptop is not that hard to carry around compared to an 8x10 field camera. I can assure you that my knowlage of B/W film is very extensive as I used to test new films for Ilford. I expected someone to bite with what I wrote, and I did not make the statment lightly. I stand by what I have said as I have the results to prove it. I guess that we will just have to agree to disagree! Bruce --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@i...> wrote: > > Sorry, that was meant to be addressed to Bruce, not Paulo... > > > > > Paulo, > > > > > I have with my Leaf Volarie 6 mp 3 shot chip used in a 1 shot > > > mode...giving me B/W capture only just blow film out > > > of the water, I have a tonal range and quality of image that I can > > > not even come close to in the wet darkroom. > > > > That certainly hasn't been my experience. I also use a Leaf 6M camera (as > > well as a 7k scanning back), and I get better B&W (and color) > > results using > > film with my Hasselblad. 6M only gives you 2000 x 3000, and > > that, at 200PPI > > to the printer gives you a 10 x 15 image without rezzing it > > up...and that's > > quite low PPI to the printer, mind you. It can make pretty decent 8x10s > > though...but the tonality doesn't come near to comparing. > > > > > I recently upgraded to a > > > Sinar 44 16 mp chip and the results are even better now. ...The > > best I can > > get is 8 stops from film I get 11 from > > > the chip. > > > > Then you are not using your film as well as it can be used. I > > routinely get > > 11 stops from B&W film. Also, you are tethered as well as require your > > images to be still for the MINUTES it takes to make the scan. > > > > Digital certainly has it's place, but for B&W, it certainly doesn't "blow > > film out of the water". It has certain advantages, and film has certain > > advantages. You have to tailor your use to your needs. > > > > Austin > >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-15 by Bruce Alexander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.