Digital BW, The Print

Gus,

It's as relevant as someone wants to make it.  What's relevant to you or
irrelevant to you may be very important or completely unimportant to someone
else.  It's someone's own business what's important/not important to them.

Why I asked, is because the small images looked very un-natural to me, so I
wondered if they had been manipulated.  The larger images are much more
natural looking to me.  I know that I'm not a fan of very unnatural looking
images, whether they are massively manipulated images or not.  That's my
personal taste, and certainly doesn't have to be anyone else's.

Austin

> No, they are not "mega-photoshoped". They are just good photographs. It
> has almost the same look and feel of Michael Kena's night photography.
> Come to think of it, what if they were manipulated with Photoshop? Would
> that make it any less? Why is that question even relevant? Have you ever
> heard someone saying "mega-darkroomed"? It makes as little sense to me
> as your question.
>
> g
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...]
> Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 3:39 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
>
> Steve,
>
> Don't they look mega-photoshoped to you?
>
> Austin
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sdmey4@... [mailto:sdmey4@...]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 5:59 PM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
> >
> >
> > http://www.afterimagegallery.com/osbornnew.htm
> > Ink getting you down? Check these out...
> > Steve M.