I have never gotten a mislabled bottle of ink from MIS, however I do always check. I have had no problem visually checking the relative ink densities of MIS FS and FSE ink sets by dipping a cotton q-tip in the ink bottle and lightly and quickly *painting* an ink patch on my paper stock (EAM/EHM). You do need to let the patches completely dry and settle in before making a final check. I usually wait over night or at least an hour or two if dried with an incandesant lamp. For FS (Piezo/Epson quad and Piezo hex) the darkest to lightest should be K, C, M, Y as they come from MIS. These are easy to distinguish. For FSE (Epson hex) the darkest to lightest should be K, C, Pc, M, Y, Pm as they come from MIS. The Pc, M, Y, and Pm are close in density, but can be distinguished if you look carefully. Jeff Randall --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > >I just did a quick test by dipping strips into each 4oz bottle of a > >quad VM set prior to committing to a CIS. > > I think it is difficult to tell the dark inks apart with this type of test. > It takes a more refined method than just dipping a piece of paper in the > ink. > > >It looks like the K position is a little warm, whereas the C position > >is a blacker black. > > I would think it is unlikely MIS would mis-label the black ink. Do a smell > test. The black ink will have a stronger solvent smell than the cyan ink. > > > Y is obviously the blue toning ink. > > Correct for quad inksets, but hextone vm inksets use the magenta position > for the toner. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Reliability of MIS VM bottle labeling
2002-09-16 by Jeff Randall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.