Digital BW, The Print

Bill,

> In this sense,
> photography as Art
> (as opposed to snap-shot) is really no more nor less "representational" or
> "abstract" than painting.

I must admit, I AM fascinated that anyone can view photography, in general,
that way...as in my 30 or so years of photography, I've never heard anyone
consider photography, in general, as anything but representational.  It's
just so out of perspective (to me), I simply can't see how anyone can arrive
at the conclusion it is anything but.  That's not to say some photography
can't be considered "abstract", there's simply no debate there...but
ALL...no.

Austin