If you all would (have) change(d) the header then those who want to ignore the evolution of photography and its role in represention of reality could do so...others of us might have chimed in. On a technical basis therefore your discussions have veered from popularist culture in the ommission of all interested parties. Seems if we can debate the accuracy of a resolution, meaning of resolution and how it relates to the fovea of an eye and the depth of a pixelized information to resolve grain...well we could change the header for accuracy ;-) That's my Babble, read it how you like ;-) Cleavis Who would have liked to chime in and remembers that photograph didn't start with the role of representing reality, struggled with it avoiding it, them a period of embracing it...we'll simply read what we've done next.
Message
Change the header
2002-09-18 by Cleavis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.