Either a prints speaks for itself or it doesn't say anything. In either case you it was made really doesn't matter, doesn it? Truman Jerry Olson wrote: > Why on earth would you need that info displayed? > > When's the last time you saw a silver print with the note that it was made > on Oriental seagull grade 3 paper with heavy burning and dodging? > Developed in straight Dektol... Overdeveloped 2 minutes to get added > contrast... Yellow filter over the lens.... unsharp mask applied in the > darkroom... Archivally washed, > and Selenium toned for deeper blacks... > > I present my work as a fine art print. Details don't matter, unless the > purchaser of the print asks. > > Jerry > > > > > I have no problem with manipulating or enhancing an image in > > > > PS. I > > > > just think photographers should be EXPLICITLY up front about > > > > what, if > > > > any, PS tools and techniques may have been used.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-19 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.