I've have photos of Howard Bond, old Ansel himself and and a few other very good photographers hanging one the walls of my house. I even have a Picasso lithograph hanging on the wall that my ex-wife gave me for my birthday before she was my ex ( and tired to steal after she was). The only thing I am concerned with when I buy art work is to know the artist used materials that hold up over time, i.e., archival. I really don't care to much for the details. I have found that the only work I ask about "how it was made" is mediocre at best and which I have no intention of buying, but a passing curiosity of how it was done. I must add to this, my perspective is of one who has a "day job" and is not making a living doing commercial work - although I have sold photography it is not my living. Hence I have not suffered some of the pressures of pleasing the "customer to pay the rent." Truman Richard Sintchak wrote: > Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 5:09:27 PM, Truman Prevatt wrote: > > TP> Either a prints speaks for itself or it doesn't say anything. In > either > TP> case you it was made really doesn't matter, doesn it? > > > To the artist perhaps not. To his contemporaries maybe. To a > purchaser it very well may. > > Best regards, > Richard > > mailto:richard@... >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-19 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.