All that matters in art is the end result. If someone practices a saxophone for 10,000 hours nobody cares or thinks about it . What they hear at the performance is the only thing that's important. When a piece of art is presented the question of how many hours it took to create it has no relevance. I've known artists who can capture a scene with a few strokes and photographers who hit on almost every shot they take. Nobody has yet been able to explain the creative instincts and time or sweat is not necessarily the only or most important ingredient. There is passion, discipline, ability to communicate, etc. involved. Production is a formula approach and is a business term. A hand crafted rug can be a fine example of craft or a work of art. There is a difference and the time spent is probably not the criteria. Talent has something to do with it. Van Gogh painted fast, Seurat took a year. So what? Bird was stoned most of the time and made fantastic music. Clifford Brown was straight and made fantastic music. Pollack was drunk most of the time and was an influence. The end result is what is treasured and remembered. My rant is over. Barry Schaffer------I know there are other Barry's on the site and I don't want them to get in trouble for my opinions. jean wall penland speaks truth! I did own an art gallery and saw a lot of crap try to be hung. No way Jose. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Sintchak" <richard@...> To: "jean wall penland" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 5:11 PM Subject: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Re: Pumping up the saturation > Thursday, September 19, 2002, 1:27:47 PM, jean wall penland wrote: > > jwp> What difference should it make how much time is spent on a work of art? > > But it does. Art is not always merely the end result and how it > "looks". Often the hard work and craft involved, and the talent of the > process, can be a HUGE part of what makes one piece of art more > treasured and admired than another. Hand-crafted rugs immediately come > to mind. Fine art B&W prints another. > > Does anyone else really believe that *all the matters* is what results > in the end? That's not art, that's production. > > > Best regards, > Richard > > mailto:richard@... > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: Re[2]: [Digital BW] Re: Pumping up the saturation
2002-09-20 by bgs
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.