my last two cents, I promise ;) The difference : how many wish to attentively listen a performance of digital saxaphone whereby a most perfectly executed song 'created' by the software programmer is rendered at the push of the 'operators' sax button ? That is the difference I think many feel with regards to digital imaging: a sort of "if I could afford the software he has, I could do the same thing " The impression I believe, is that the Software eliminates the requirement for photographic skill and creativity. Best to all, Alex --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "bgs" <bgs@b...> wrote: > All that matters in art is the end result. If someone practices a saxophone for 10,000 hours nobody cares or thinks about it . What they hear at the performance is the only thing that's important. > >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Pumping up the saturation
2002-09-20 by B. Alex Pettit Jr.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.