Hi Martin- That does not really conform with my experience with PS- albeit on a Mac... (but let's not go there! ;^) With the operations that you feel are slowing down, what does the "efficiency" box tell you is going on? The scratch disk utilization numbers are only numbers- they don't directly tell you whether PS is slowing down or not. If the efficiency goes down, then there is a problem, presumably with your Windows memory settings. On a Mac, PS can't use more than 1 Gig anyway, so I use 350 MB of ram as a ram scratch disk; makes a big difference with 500 MB files. Bill Morse PhotoProspect Cambridge, MA 02139 on 9/20/02 11:25 AM, Martin Wesley wrote: > One of the problems is that PS seems to basically have an antiquated memory > management system that does not mesh well with OS memory management. Even > with 1.5+GB of RAM PS will preferentially spool data out of memory to disk. > It is not uncommon to open a large file and have it all go into RAM but at > the first action PS spools it to disk and only uses a fraction of available > RAM.
Message
Photoshop efficiency- was: Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution
2002-09-20 by Bill Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.