Hi Anthony, > > I use Delta 3200, XTOL 1:1 and it looks pretty > > damn good! > > But then there is the problem of Ilford take-up spools, which I prefer to > avoid. It really isn't a big issue...either just don't use Ilford take up spools, or simply set the start of tilm before the little arrow...works fine. > > Unfortunately, not many of the digicams will be > > B&W...and I'm not a fan of the RGB conversions. > > There's a tremendous amount of flexibility in shooting B&W on > film. I fear > much of that may fall by the wayside with the move to digital, and > everything will just be little more than desaturated RGB. Agreed. > > I wonder how many people would buy such a > > back, if it were priced in the low $k's? > > I'd say that it would have to cost no more than the 'Blad body (the least > expensive body), and it would have to be fully autonomous and > would have to > be able to work for hours and store hundreds of images. It will > be a while. Or use removable memory, just like one uses film... > And even when it comes, it will be a RGB back, not a B&W back, > and I'm sure > there will be no way to get it to work in pure black and white. There is a demand for pure monochrome sensors, believe it or not. They are made. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution
2002-09-20 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.