Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution

2002-09-20 by Austin Franklin

Hi Anthony,

> > I use Delta 3200, XTOL 1:1 and it looks pretty
> > damn good!
>
> But then there is the problem of Ilford take-up spools, which I prefer to
> avoid.

It really isn't a big issue...either just don't use Ilford take up spools,
or simply set the start of tilm before the little arrow...works fine.

> > Unfortunately, not many of the digicams will be
> > B&W...and I'm not a fan of the RGB conversions.
>
> There's a tremendous amount of flexibility in shooting B&W on
> film.  I fear
> much of that may fall by the wayside with the move to digital, and
> everything will just be little more than desaturated RGB.

Agreed.

> > I wonder how many people would buy such a
> > back, if it were priced in the low $k's?
>
> I'd say that it would have to cost no more than the 'Blad body (the least
> expensive body), and it would have to be fully autonomous and
> would have to
> be able to work for hours and store hundreds of images.  It will
> be a while.

Or use removable memory, just like one uses film...

> And even when it comes, it will be a RGB back, not a B&W back,
> and I'm sure
> there will be no way to get it to work in pure black and white.

There is a demand for pure monochrome sensors, believe it or not.  They are
made.

Regards,

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.