Bill, Had to check the manual to find that readout. The number never seems to change during an action but will revise itself after the action is finished sometimes. With a 1.6GB file open it reads 28%. After doing a lasso action it goes up to 30% and after feathering the selection it goes up to 71%. At the same time the RAM usage is falling from 1.4GB to 500MB. Doing a mode change brings the Efficiency up to 100% and the RAM usage up to 1.3MB but there is intense drive action going on and CPU usage is down below 10% at the end of the mode change Efficiency reads 40%. Working with a 560MB file Eff. stays at 100% during an Unsharp Mask action but at the end drops to 71%. Memory usage climes from 700MB to 1.3GB. A mode change drops Eff to 35% and memory usage stays constant. PS and Wind 2000 memory management just don't seem to talk to each other very well and I suspect that the Efficiency values may not mean anything. I should do some research on maximizing Win 2000's memory management. Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Morse" <willym@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Photoshop efficiency > Martin, what does PS say in the "Efficiency" box, when you are experiencing > this slowdown? > > Bill > > on 9/20/02 1:36 PM, Martin Wesley wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bill Morse" <willym@...> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:38 AM > > Subject: [Digital BW] Photoshop efficiency- was: Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution > > > > > >> Hi Martin- > >> > >> That does not really conform with my experience with PS- albeit on a > > Mac... > >> (but let's not go there! ;^) > > > > Bill, > > > > We certainly don't need a platform war! <G> > >> > >> With the operations that you feel are slowing down, what does the > >> "efficiency" box tell you is going on? The scratch disk utilization > > numbers > >> are only numbers- they don't directly tell you whether PS is slowing down > > or > >> not. > > > > The slow down is that the scratch disk is being used too much rather than > > RAM. Obviously if I have 1.5GB of RAM and a 1.6GB file there is no choice. > > Even with a 500MB the 1.5GB of RAM is less than Adobe's RAM recommendation > > of 5 to 7 times file size. > >> > >> If the efficiency goes down, then there is a problem, presumably with your > >> Windows memory settings. > > > > The problem is that Adobe does not appear to adhere to Window memory > > management conventions. Have done some trials setting up multiple Pagefiles > > in Windows providing up to 8GB of virtual memory on top of the physical RAM > > and PS simply ignores it sending stuff off to the scratch disk for no good > > reason. PS appears to be unaware of how much memory Windows is making > > available to it. > >> > >> On a Mac, PS can't use more than 1 Gig anyway, so I use 350 MB of ram as a > >> ram scratch disk; makes a big difference with 500 MB files. > > > > I can get PS to use up to 1.5GB under Windows but only if 5 times the file > > size or ~300MB fits within that. When I open a file PS takes over RAM > > roughly equal to 5 times the file size just to start. Beyond 250 to 300MB PS > > will momentarily use all of the available memory and than it is off to the > > scratch disk with the data and PS is using less memory with the larger file > > than the smaller one. It appears to like to use a maximum of about 1GB even > > though more is available. While there is not a strict limit, it seems to > > mimic the 1GB Mac limitation. The RAM disk is an excellent idea however > > and makes the new PC mother boards that will take up to 3GB or 4GB of RAM > > more interesting. 1.5GB for PS and a 2GB RAM Scratch disk might be a real > > screamer. I will try creating a 500MB RAM disk as the primary scratch disk > > leaving PS with 800 to 900MB of RAM and see what I get. > > > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > >> > >> on 9/20/02 11:25 AM, Martin Wesley wrote: > >> > >>> One of the problems is that PS seems to basically have an antiquated > > memory > >>> management system that does not mesh well with OS memory management. > > Even > >>> with 1.5+GB of RAM PS will preferentially spool data out of memory to > > disk. > >>> It is not uncommon to open a large file and have it all go into RAM but > > at > >>> the first action PS spools it to disk and only uses a fraction of > > available > >>> RAM. > >> > >> > >> > >> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > >> > >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >> > >> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > > page. > >> > >> Please follow these basic guidelines: > >> - Include your full name with your message. > >> - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > >> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > > them short. > >> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > >> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > >> - Complete your Yahoo profile. > >> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > > resources on the homepage. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > > them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Photoshop efficiency
2002-09-21 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.