Digital BW, The Print

Anthony Atkielski wrote:

>Keith writes:
>
>  
>
>>Keep as few disks NTFS as possible -- the
>>security features eat performance so don't
>>use it on a standalone or small office machine
>>at all....
>>    
>>
>
>I disagree.  Lose power at the wrong time on a FAT system, and you lose
>everything.  NTFS is much more resistant to corruption, and is generally
>much more solid overall.  The processor time required to handle the file
>system is insignificant compared to other consumers of processor resources.
>
>
>
>  
>
Between that and your comment on Ceon vs. non-Xeon,, and refusing to 
compare compatable Xeon and non-Xeon Intel CPUs... You sure you ain't 
working for/with Intel or M$?

Keith
 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]