Moreno Polloni wrote:
>>But what about Intel Xeon vs Intel non-Xeon? Ya gots ta compare
apples to
>>pineapples!
>>
>>
>
>Nice try. My post compared the dual Xeon to the Athlon MP and dual G4. In
>Your first reply, you mentioned Xeon vs non-Xeon, and now you've modified
>that statement to Xeon vs "Intel" non-Xeon. Doesn't really matter
though, as
>the dual Xeon is much faster than any other dual Intel (Itanium excluded).
>
>
For those who want to undrstand WHY Moreno may be reticent to do such a
comparison, start at:
http://www.arstechnica.com/ask-ars/2000/ask-11202000.html
Keep in mind that all the PIII chips since about 99 have been made with
Coppermine technology, the PIII technology referenced in the article...
I've got dual PIII1000e (Coppermine) CPUs... If you buy PIIIs make sure
they are Coppermine..
Also try this link for fuller comparisons including Macs:
http://macspeedzone.com/archive/html/hardw/misc/a/win_vs_mac/ray.html
To get any significant increased Performance of a Xeon PIII over a
Coppermine PIII (and that mostly in database type apps) you need more
than 256k on die L2 cache...
Chip prices for those chips are double or more than of a PIII Coppermine...
There is no way in hell you will get more than a 10% performance
increase in PShop over a similar Coppermine equipped PIII...
FOR ACTUAL Photoshop tests check:
http://www.digit-life.com/articles/pentium4xeonsmp/
As you will read there, even SMP won't give more than a max of 15% on
average in PShop.. (Filtering operations may IMHO be about 60% faster
on a dual CPU than a single CPU -- so a dualie only makes sense if like
I, you are doing a lot of filtering, and the additional L2 cache of the
Xeon ain't gonna boost that much..)
Since Pshop still uses a lot of disk caching (scratch disk), me
suspects the RAID array makes a big difference in Moreno's numbers...
:-)
Keith
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is \ufffd Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001-2002, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Absent the express written authorization of the
author, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or
distribution is explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you
are not, or are unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original
message. Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
POV IMage Service Banner
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
</div>Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution
2002-09-21 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.