Hi Moreno, > > That's not necessarily true. It depends on the function. > Reading a file > > has nothing to do with the CPU, so what faster means is dubious in your > > statement. > > My original post referred to a CPU intensive function, and we've been > discussing different CPU's. Who's talking about file load times? We were talking about performance in general with PS, and that really takes everything into consideration, disk speed, memory speed, somewhat display speed... etc. > > Or, are you going by the Intel advertising, claiming that you > > need a dual 2.4G computer to browse the internet "faster" ;-) > > Yes. I'm totally brainwashed by Intel's advertising. I'm even > going to order > one of their bunny suits. Actually, funny you should mention that...I have a couple of them. I got them when Intel bought the Digital fab in Hudson...they can be used in certain fun circumstances ;-) Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution
2002-09-21 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.