Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution

2002-09-21 by Austin Franklin

Hi Moreno,

> > That's not necessarily true.  It depends on the function.
> Reading a file
> > has nothing to do with the CPU, so what faster means is dubious in your
> > statement.
>
> My original post referred to a CPU intensive function, and we've been
> discussing different CPU's. Who's talking about file load times?

We were talking about performance in general with PS, and that really takes
everything into consideration, disk speed, memory speed, somewhat display
speed... etc.

> > Or, are you going by the Intel advertising, claiming that you
> > need a dual 2.4G computer to browse the internet "faster" ;-)
>
> Yes. I'm totally brainwashed by Intel's advertising. I'm even
> going to order
> one of their bunny suits.

Actually, funny you should mention that...I have a couple of them.  I got
them when Intel bought the Digital fab in Hudson...they can be used in
certain fun circumstances ;-)

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.