> > My original post referred to a CPU intensive function, and we've been > > discussing different CPU's. Who's talking about file load times? > > We were talking about performance in general with PS, and that really takes > everything into consideration, disk speed, memory speed, somewhat display > speed... etc. I was talking only about Guassian blur performance. Disk speed and display speed don't apply. > > > Or, are you going by the Intel advertising, claiming that you > > > need a dual 2.4G computer to browse the internet "faster" ;-) > > > > Yes. I'm totally brainwashed by Intel's advertising. I'm even > > going to order > > one of their bunny suits. > > Actually, funny you should mention that...I have a couple of them. I got > them when Intel bought the Digital fab in Hudson...they can be used in > certain fun circumstances ;-) Send one up along with your camera gear.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution
2002-09-21 by Moreno Polloni
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.