Loris, > According to me the file itself doesn't need adjustments; I work on a > calibrated monitor and the print I made with Woolf workflow was very close > what I was seeing on the monitor... that's not the point. Every workflow (technique, paper, ink, printer) has a different input - output curve and therefore it should be calibrated individually. With colors you can use the icc standard and the corresponding measuring tools and software to control the hardware (if you are willing to spend a few thousand bugs). With Piezo it is different and you have to adjust the monitor visually to match the print and compensate for individual hardware (the other way round and not totally equivalent). If you have achieved a pretty good match you should adjust your image in the appropriate way to get the "right" print. As a result your image data are changed and somewhat different if you print with Woolfs workflow or with the Piezo driver. You could use Tylers method and Photoshops color management to recalculate the image data if you have saved your dot gain curves as icc profiles for each workflow. But I think this is not really recommended in the Piezo manual for one reason or the other... Peter
Message
[Digital BW] using the piezo plug in: was: Re[2]: Cone Announces New Blacks
2002-10-01 by Peter Baumbach
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.