Mark, My Epson 1280 seems to feed very well and swallows 350 gsm Eclipse Velvet without a problem so I would suspect that it would have a reasonable shot at feeding the 425 Epson Smooth Fine Art. The problem is still the $200+ cost for a package of sheets to see if I like or not, and my lack of a cutter to get it down to 8.5x11 and 11x17 sizes. My Rotatrim is only 20". In the long haul I have enough to do without having to convert all the paper I use. As soon as it is available in desktop sizes I will definately give it a try since it sounds like a wonderful paper. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Mark Tucker" <mark@m...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > I have not seen any of the Epson Fine Art Smooth. I believe it is > > available only in rolls. So I can't comment on that one. > > The Epson Smooth Fine Art is available two ways: in 24"x30" > sheets, at a whopping 425gsm; and in 24"x50' rolls, at a more > standard 225gsm. > > This has been my main printing paper for months now. > According to Robert Rex of Crane yesterday, it has no OBA's, > which was a relief. (Crane makes the paper, but Epson markets > it with their name). Subjectively, I would rate the paper base color > as "white"; it's not creamy in any way. So this is good to get a > paper that's white, and yet not having any brighteners. > > Several people have expressed concern over using the sheet > weight in smaller printers like the 1280 or 1160 or 3000. I don't > know whether or not it's too heavy to move through those paper > transports. I use the 7000 Epson, and it works great with that. > > But I LOVE the weight of the sheets. Even at 8x10 size, it feels > like a substantial piece in your hand. The 225gsm roll weight, > especially when printed large, at about 20x24, just feels kinda > mamby-pamby, like you're afraid to touch it because it would > crimp too easily. But the sheet weight is killer. Cut down in > quarters, you'd get a 12"x15" sheet out of a master; the cost > would be about $1.90 per 12x15. > > I do believe it's designed primarily for pigmented inks, ie > 7500/9500, and honestly I don't know the risk of running a > "pigment paper" with dyes or hexes or Piezo, in terms of > fading/shifting,etc. > > Here's a PDF with more info: > http://prographics.epson.com/pdf/SmoothFineArt.pdf > > -Mark Tucker
Message
Re: EAM smoothness/300g+weight - ESFA
2001-09-06 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.