> No Bruce, they are NOT the same thing. They are viewed entirely > differently. Take a look at your VCR and freeze frame an image. Moving > they look far better, since the defects in each image are not apparent, as > the moving image will "smooth" these defects out. When looking at a still > image, you are looking at ONE image, and any defects are in and of that one > image. > > Also, the imaging sensors for video are typically different, and of much > lower image quality. They are interline sensors, which have lower imaging > fidelity, but higher frame rates. Hi Austin, The defects being interlace? What about shooting video in non-interlaced mode. Each frame is identical (no interlace). 30 frames per second. While the Sony I played with was a lower frame rate and during playback it was not smooth to watch, the Canon at 30fps I'm told is movie like. Just curious, Carolyn
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT: The Foveon talk I mentioned at the San Fran. get tog...
2002-10-10 by Carolyn Frayn