On 10/10/02 9:08 AM, "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> wrote: >> [snip] >>> If you are scanning 35mm, and will >>> be making huge >>> prints on the Epson 10000, then you really have one choice- a Tango scan >>> mounted with Kami fluid on the drum. That film is just too >> small to get a >>> really good scan on anything >>> less. >>> >> IMO, if you are regularly attempting to push 35mm beyond its limits (e.g., >> huge prints), no amount of drum scanning, prayer or voodoo magic can help >> you. You should really be skipping the drum scans and putting that money >> toward a film format that CAN handle the gigantic prints. >> >> As long as you respect the inherent limits of the film format and are able >> to get a decent exposure on film, I see no need to ever get a >> 35mm drum scan >> vs. what you can get with one of the 4000dpi dedicated film scanners and a >> reasonably talented operator. Unless you just have some excess money you >> need to get rid of, in which case feel free to give me a call.... ;-) >> >> Doug > > Doug, > > Though I agree with you completely in principle, there are ways of getting > amazing results from 35mm, and one is to use a tripod. You won't get better > than 40lp/mm from hand held no matter how hard you try...and that's usually > the killer, more so than simply film grain. The obvious other, is to use > the best films you can, with careful exposure and development. I get some > absolutely amazing results from Delta 100 and Plus-X from 35mm film. > > Austin > > Absolutely, and consider using a rangefinder instead of an SLR (either 35 or medium format). I've recently started shooting a Mamiya 7II for some landscape work. Its really incredible what you can get handheld without a giant mirror to rattle the works. The mamiya 6x7 negs are just begging for something bigger than my 7000. Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The State of Personal Scanner Technology
2002-10-10 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.