> As long as you respect the inherent limits of the film format and are able > to get a decent exposure on film, I see no need to ever get a 35mm drum scan > vs. what you can get with one of the 4000dpi dedicated film scanners and a > reasonably talented operator. Is the Nikon 4000 state of the art? Anything cheaper? Essentially what you're saying, as I understand it, is that for considerably less than two grand I can the best setup available for 35mm lightroom work. (I shoot Leica and Contax, and have been known to use a tripod.) Sorry for these neophytic questions... Douglas Cooper www.dysmedia.com
Message
Re: The State of Personal Scanner Technology
2002-10-10 by Douglas Anthony Cooper