Zone Good: Soft enveloping light, light overcast. Expose and develop normally.
Zone Bad: Dark, overcast, maybe a little drizzle. Use a higher EI and add about 20% or so to development.
Zone Ugly: Sun, no clouds. Use a lower EI and reduce development about 20% or more.
Zone Butt-ugly: Bright sun, squinting. Go see a movie.
(not original with me, but I don't know to whom to attribute)
----- Original Message -----
From: Austin Franklin
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Film for scanning was Re: The State of PersonalScanner Technology
Hi Roger,
Why do you believe there aren't? I always shoot using "the Zone System"
(which means different things to different people) and compensation
development (if it's needed)...but I specifically cram all the tonality from
the scene into the film as best I can!
Austin
>
> Ain't there any zonies left out there? I was taught to set the
> asa (for use in an individual camera) of a B&W film to the value
> that produces a densitiy of 0.08 to 0.1 above film base & fog.
> Then to set the development time to that which will produce a
> zone VIII print value from a zone VIII placement. This approach
> usually produces very printable negatives except when conditions
> require N+ or N- development (not too common an occurence in my
> limited experience).
>
> Roger
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:25 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Film for scanning was Re: The State of
> PersonalScanner Technology
>
>
> > > I shoot using a camera ;-), for 35mm, typically a Contax RTS
> > III or a Leica
> > > M6...and appropriate Zeiss or Leica lense... I develop in
> D-76 1:1 in a
> > > Jobo ATL-1500. I have been ecstatic with D-76 1:1 for low
> grain noise.
> >
> > Thanks, D-76 1:1 has been what I've been getting good results
> > with using the
> > Delta 400. Do you shoot the Delta 100 at 100...or lower?
> How about cook
> > time...do you pull it out early for scanning?
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I typically rate film for it's rating, so 100 at 100, 400 at 400...and
> adjust my developing times so I get exactly what I want.
>
> I don't know if I pull it out early or not, as I experiment to
> get my own
> times. I process at 75, and for Delta 100, I develop for 8 minutes D-76
> 1:1.
>
> Regards,
>
> Austin
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Film for scanning was Re: The State of PersonalScanner Technology
2002-10-11 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.