Hi Martin, > At least you finally agree you need more "steps" than the range divided my > the minimum discernable difference. You are making progress. <<G>> (Sorry. > Couldn't resist.) Ah, you know that wasn't what the debate was about...it was the claim of "thousands" or something like that, that simply wasn't physically possible. > > Now, how many is debatable ;-) > > I'll sit this round out <G> but if someone is looking for a doctor thesis > topic I am sure a value or range of values could be arrived at through > scientific investigation. Four. ;-) Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Film for scanning was Re: The State of PersonalScanner Technology
2002-10-11 by Austin Franklin