yes, that is the scale. > > On the bottom of the histogram you are looking at the 16 bit file on, isn't > the scale 0-255? > > Austin > > > > Andrew, > > I duplicated the 16 bit file and converted to 8bit - then compared > > the histograms - you are right there is less combing viewed in 88 > > bit - but it's still there albeit not quite as bad as in 16 > > > > ? > > Frank > > > > after minor contrast adj in 16 bit scans (moving the end sliders > > to > > > > the edges of the histogram & the middle to fix the mid tones), I > > > > still have 'drop out' or combed histograms - any ideas, tips ? > > > > > > Convert the file to 8 bits THEN look at the Histogram. You should > > see NO > > > combs.
Message
Re: 'combed' histograms in 16 bit ?
2002-10-11 by frankg_photo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.