Digital BW, The Print

Nikon is excellent, so is the Canon 4000 filmscanner, and a lot less
expensive. Try em both out before you buy.

Jerry




Douglas Anthony Cooper wrote:
> 
> > As long as you respect the inherent limits of the film format and are able
> > to get a decent exposure on film, I see no need to ever get a 35mm drum scan
> > vs. what you can get with one of the 4000dpi dedicated film scanners and a
> > reasonably talented operator.
> 
> Is the Nikon 4000 state of the art?  Anything cheaper?  Essentially what
> you're saying, as I understand it, is that for considerably less than two
> grand I can the best setup available for 35mm lightroom work.  (I shoot
> Leica and Contax, and have been known to use a tripod.)
> 
> Sorry for these neophytic questions...
> 
> Douglas Cooper
> www.dysmedia.com
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/