Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Is there a difference? - Coatings

2002-10-15 by Ken Carney

Paul, thank you very much for this detailed information.  I have been fascinated by the concept ever since seeing some of Paul Strand's coated platinum prints.  In fact, the process you describe seems very close to how I coat paper with platinum/palladium.  I have a number of glass tube coating rods, though ultimately I favor the Haku brush which allows double coating for pt/pd.  The brush is probably not such a good idea for inkjets.   I will get busy on this at the earliest opportunity.   I am at something of a crossroads where I need to decide whether to go with high res imagesetter negs for contact printing on silver paper, or stay with inkjet.  Frankly, the darkroom is a bit of a drag, so I'm excited about anything that enhances the inkjet print.

  --Ken  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Roark 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:26 PM
  Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Is there a difference? - Coatings


  Ken,

  Robert, Martin, Nghi and others on this list have done far more than I with
  varnishing.  I'm just starting to experiment.  So far I see varnishing as
  good to physically protect prints, to raise the Dmax where there is going to
  be no glass in the framing, and for a variety of aesthetic reasons.  I do
  not see it as something I'll be doing with a high percentage of my prints.

  One can achieve a number of different finished looks depending on the number
  of coats that are applied and the materials that are used.  I personally
  like a luster rather than a high-gloss finish.  Also, since I like to be
  done with the process as fast as possible, I've been leaning toward the
  one-coat solution.  And for that, we're talking about just a few minutes of
  work.  (Eclipse gives me a nice finish with a Dmax of about 2.17 with only
  one coat.)

  So far, I favor Robert's recommended #15 wire-wound ("Mayer") rod (from
  Diversified Enterprises 800-833-4644) for applying the coatings.  I've been
  using a 16" (12" of winding) 1/2 inch thick rod that sells for $22.  It's
  the only process I've tried that can do a perfect finish in one coat.

  For coating material, most on this list like the Golden water-based acrylic
  for the first coat. l have some on order, but so far have just tried the
  Liquitex version -- readily available.  At 3 parts Liquitex to 1 part water
  it goes on perfectly.

  Frankly, however, I think a water-based polyurethane might be a better
  choice.  The acrylic first layer is favored by conservators because at least
  the Golden version is removable -- in theory.  However, I don't think that
  factor is important in this application.  I see the coating as part of the
  product, not an after-thought that is applied just to protect the artwork.
  I think the polyurethane's superior toughness and resistance to humidity and
  chemicals may make it a better choice.

  Varathane makes several water-based "Diamond Wood Finishes" (blue can at
  your local hardware) that appear to work very well -- no dilution needed.
  The "Outdoor" version has UV inhibitors that could be useful (in fade
  testing now).  However, I don't like much yellowing, and, like UV filters,
  these UV inhibitors are slightly yellow.  The Eclipse, however, is bright
  enough and blue enough that with one coat it stays bright and 0.01 units
  cool.

  EAM just gets too yellow with the UV inhibitors.  So, to get rid of them
  with polyurethane, use Varathane "Interior."  This formula was made for
  maximum clarity.  With EAM the first coat remains almost a matte and the
  Dmax is only up to 1.72.  However, with a second coat EAM is a nice luster
  with up to 2.33 for the Dmax.

  I have no idea how others are applying these coatings with a rod, but I just
  tape the top 1/8 inch of the print to a piece of glass using Scotch
  Removable tape.  (The glass is for a smooth, flat surface that I can razor
  off dried coating if necessary.)  I've been using a couple sheets of copy
  paper under the print.  I also tape down the bottom corners.  About 7 cc of
  Varathane pulled straight form the can with a syringe is used to lay a
  "bead" on the tape and glass above the print.  Pull some water into the
  syringe and discharge it immediately a couple of times to stop the
  polyurethane from setting up.

  Just before pulling the rod across the print, use a blower to be sure there
  is no dust on it.  Since you always use fresh coating from the can, which is
  only open long enough to pull out what you need, there should never be dust
  in the coating material.

  After the "bead" (or small, long, center-weighted pool) of coating is on the
  tape and glass above the print, just pull the rod through the bead and down
  across the print.  The weight of the rod supplies most of the downward force
  needed.  Don't roll the rod, drag it smoothly and not too slowly.  Keep the
  speed of the pull as constant as possible.  After you've pulled the excess
  coating away from the bottom of the print, immediately rinse off the rod.
  Don't allow the material to set-up on the rod.  I then use a squeegee to
  pull the beads of coating off about 1/8 inch of the print and away from the
  print.  A damp sponge soaks up the excess coating material and will clean
  the glass easily after you're done.

  For the first coat, the material will be tacky enough to hang the print in a
  stretcher or just pin its corners to a board by the time you've done all
  this.  You do want to keep it flat while it dries a little.  You'll lose
  about 1/4 inch of the print, but you still have a good 8x10 print area.

  Again, I've just started this, so I'm sure Robert and others have far more
  refined methods and materials than I'm using.  But at my crude level, this
  is really easy to do.  Whether the aesthetics are appealing is subjective.
  However, the finishes that are possible once you've protected the print with
  that first good layer is really wide open -- and where a lot of the creative
  stuff is going to be done.

  Paul
  http://www.PaulRoark.com

  ________________________________________



  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ken Carney [mailto:kcarney1@...]
  Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 5:56 PM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Is there a difference?


    Paul, could you please give some detail as to the varnishing, if possible
  with different papers?  Forgive me if this has been covered before.   I have
  used Renaissance wax on silver prints with some success, and I know Paul
  Strand would sometimes varnish his prints.  Thx for any info.

      --Ken
      Everyone wants darker blacks, but the difference is really just a matter
  of
      glossy versus flat matte finish.  Mounted under glass, the flat
  pigmented
      prints look like silver prints in most lighting.  Only in perfect spot
      lighting with no reflections do you really see the difference.  Also,
  one
      simple coat of varnish takes an Eclipse print Dmax from 1.58 to 2.17.
  At
      that point, more black isn't worth worrying too much about.



    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


          Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
                ADVERTISEMENT




    Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
  other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

    If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
  unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
  page.

    Please follow these basic guidelines:
    - Include your full name with your message.
    - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
    - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
  them short.
    - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
    - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
  "flames."
    - Complete your Yahoo profile.
    - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
  resources on the homepage.




    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.