Very nicely put. To say one is "better" than the other strikes me as similar to saying that an acrylic painting is "better" than an oil painting (or vice versa). Maybe not apples and oranges being compared here, but perhaps oranges and tangerines. I think the nature of the difference is interesting to delineate, but fail to see how couching the delineation in terms of which is "better" helps to clarify this distinction. Surely there are some images that even the most die-hard darkroom enthusiast might like better as a digital print (or vice-versa). More anon, David = = = Original message from Moreno Polloni = = = I also find the degree of digital control to be much finer, the prints are sharper, and there's better consistency from print to print. Silver prints, however, are free from dither patterns and have a creamy smoothness and subtlety of tones that I have yet to seen in a digital inkjet print. ___________________________________________________________ Sent by ePrompter, the premier email notification software. Free download at http://www.ePrompter.com.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Is there a difference?
2002-10-16 by david_bookbinder@sprynet.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.