Digital BW, The Print

Barry,

None of my messages have failed to be posted.  Perhaps the cadre of
sycophants are simply extolling...

I will not it interesting that no one, not even Jon, took a stab at
commenting on my issue with fading and tonal "combining" and adjusting the
tonal curves/image data to account for the fade.  I was very disappointed
that no one commented on it.  It seems like a very important issue to me,
and should be for others, since people spend so much time tweaking their
tonal curves, only to have them altered by fading.

Regards,

Austin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: flyfishingusa2002 [mailto:tflyfish@...]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:16 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Piezography 3000 moderators!
>
>
> Has anyone noticed that the Piezography 3000 group is now heavily
> censored and that only positive comments about the InjetMall
> products are being posted? They have promised many times in the past
> that there products are Archival only to be proved the opposite,
> true, their inks produce a nice print for a short while, but leave
> them for a while and the inks FADE. Would you use any of their inks
> for serious commerical work? i.e. for prints that you would sell? I
> certainly would not. My prints with MIS inks are standing the test
> of time, but before long I  predict that Epson will overtake all of
> the current independant ink suppliers with the Ultachrome or
> similar. I am already getting great results with only a little color
> cast.
> I personally believe the likes of Paul Roake and I thank him for all
> of his excellent work.
>
>
> Barry