> >> If you read the forum as often as I and many others do, you would > >> know that > >> your comment is absurdly ridiculous. > > > > I disagree that the comment was "absurdly ridiculous". It was, > IMO, a valid > > "question", whose speculative conclusion appears to not have been true. > > What question, he ASSERTED it was being heavily moderated. I know > I was hard > on Cone a few days ago and it got through. Did Barry post a > message that got > bounced, or is he just annoyed that there was a respite in the attacks? > > Todd Todd, Here is the original "question" posed by Barry: "Has anyone noticed that the Piezography 3000 group is now heavily censored and that only positive comments about the InjetMall products are being posted?" I believe that is a properly formed question, as it DOES ask a question, and it does have a question mark at the end of the sentence. Though, the question DOES contain an assertion that the group was being "moderated", it IS a question asking if others have noticed said assertion. Note, I put "question" in quotes in my comment. You must not be busy enough with the baby ;-) Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Piezography 3000 moderators!
2002-10-18 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.