The recent discussions on the merits of single-ink printing, coupled with my experience of some beautiful mono-ink prints at a friend's studio got me thinking some blue sky thoughts. Moreno's mono-ink prints were nearly indistinguishable from his quads, reinforcing the opinions of others on the list that one ink prints can look just fine. Since one ink is nearly enough to print many monochrome images, two inks should be more than enough for the resolution limits of current "consumer" inkjet printers. Two inks theoretically allows for 512 discrete shades of grey, doesn't it? Duotones rule! This leaves us with the possibility of (in four-ink printers) using *two* toner inks, not just one. The use of two, coloured toner inks, layered with a high quality monochrome image could present a whole spectrum of new creative controls. For instance, one toner ink could be warm, the other cool. We might be able to simulate the look of some of the early colour systems, like autochrome, or we might come up with completely new looks never before available. What if one of the toner inks was metallic or pearlescent? I'll bet it won't be long before we can simulate that wonderful metallic look of a Cibachrome, but in a monochrome, tinted image. Paul's probably already thought of this and is knee deep in experiments already. : ) Peter McLennan
Message
Re: mono-ink printing and blue sky thinking
2001-09-09 by Peter McLennan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.