Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Printing for Editions?

2002-11-18 by frankg_photo

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Mark Tucker" <mark@m...> 
wrote:
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "frankg_photo" 
> <frank@f...> wrote:
>  or, you later learn a new 
> > techniquein PS that greatly enhances the image, or in the fresh 
> light 
> > of dawn, you simply change your mind and that top right hand 
> corner 
> > just has to be be a tad darker :-). Can any evolving artist 
really 
> > close the door on these options ?
> 
> _______
> 
> A photographer is always evolving and learning new methods, 
> shortcuts, and techniques. He's always perfecting his craft. It's a 
> natural evolution.
> 
> Let's also hope that he's also continuing to shoot photographs. 
> New photographs. Any new techniques that you naturally learn 
> along the way would be applied to these new photographs that 
> you're making.
> 
> Who wants to sit around and obsess over some photograph that 
> you made five years ago? You did your best at that time; that was 
> then, this is now. The past is the past.
> 
> I put up some images on my site this weekend that I shot fifteen 
> years ago. My connection to them is moderate to average; I 
> simply copied the fiber print with a digital camera to get them 
> onto the web. I didn't obsess over them. Almost, in some weird 
> way, when I impulsively went to burn down a corner in one of 
> them, I stopped because I felt like I was violating the image. I 
> printed like I printed in 1985; I want to respect that. I print 
like I 
> print in 2002; obviously with a very different take on life. I 
think 
> each one deserves respect.
> 
> Just my opinion. But I'm not looking backwards.
> 
> -MT

Changing your mind about a print or edition the next morning is quite 
different from accepting what you did 15 years ago.
But hey - this is a conversation not an argument - 'cos i agree with 
your motivation/intention - i just cant yet get my head around the 
idea of destroying the negative/file after printing and saying that's 
that, and wish there were another way to achieve your intended goal- 
it's a very important issue for us all.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.