Mark- I took a look at your 1997 'Body Image Show: What you Eat', and I cannot help giggling at some of the entries. But the one that stands out has to be Jim Herrington's 'broccoli casserole at rotiers'. My whole family went to Vandy, and I am very familiar with Nashvegas, and I have no clue how somebody could choose rotier's for something other than their burgers. In fact, I think they put some kind of drug in their beef patties; they are soooo good. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Tucker [mailto:mark@...] Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:08 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Printing for Editions? --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "frankg_photo" <frank@f...> wrote: or, you later learn a new > techniquein PS that greatly enhances the image, or in the fresh light > of dawn, you simply change your mind and that top right hand corner > just has to be be a tad darker :-). Can any evolving artist really > close the door on these options ? _______ A photographer is always evolving and learning new methods, shortcuts, and techniques. He's always perfecting his craft. It's a natural evolution. Let's also hope that he's also continuing to shoot photographs. New photographs. Any new techniques that you naturally learn along the way would be applied to these new photographs that you're making. Who wants to sit around and obsess over some photograph that you made five years ago? You did your best at that time; that was then, this is now. The past is the past. I put up some images on my site this weekend that I shot fifteen years ago. My connection to them is moderate to average; I simply copied the fiber print with a digital camera to get them onto the web. I didn't obsess over them. Almost, in some weird way, when I impulsively went to burn down a corner in one of them, I stopped because I felt like I was violating the image. I printed like I printed in 1985; I want to respect that. I print like I print in 2002; obviously with a very different take on life. I think each one deserves respect. Just my opinion. But I'm not looking backwards. -MT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Printing for Editions?
2002-11-18 by Andrew Biggs
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.