I have to agree with the previous posters regarding pricing based on number of prints sold. Great idea. I believe Michael Kenna and his apprentice Rolfe Horn do this with their pricing. As a side note, Rolfe Horn's work is stunning, and a great 'value'. I believe his prints start at $450. Anyway, the whole dealer model really chaps my hide sometimes, and I recognize it for what it is. I like to believe that photographers like to collect other photographers' work, so I like to frequent galleries in my time away from home. So, I strolled into a local gallery here in Austin, and saw Saint Ansel's 'Moonrise' print (something like a 40"x50" print, or something huge like that) priced at a 'sell your double-wide' price of $175,000. Hmmm. But I remember that sized print, signed by AA himself, 'normally' sells for $60,000. Hmmmm. Interesting. But don't we want it both ways? In a way, we are collectors ourselves. No, I cannot afford huge Ansel prints, but I do like to collect prints. I am very fond of the escalating pricing model. It rewards the early adopters, so to speak, and when the prints start circulating, the price starts rising. My $.02 -----Original Message----- From: sdmey4@... [mailto:sdmey4@...] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:40 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Editions: Another Dumb Idea... Your edition outline sounds fine Mark, Any Gallery would except it. Here is what really happens. Lets say you have a portfolio of prints for sale all on editioned 16x20 papers. Guaranteed there will be a call from the Gallery about a client who wants a 20x24 or maybe even an 8x10 or even an image flipped to face the other way. Questionable business practice? after all its the gallery asking if you will make the "different print" Your could end up being the "no" guy which is fine. Most of us don't want to lose a sale, and these types of buyers pay top money. I think the best approach, if you think the image has wide appeal is to make the edition 50 and if an occasional odd size gets printed it comes out of the 50. Better yet, do what the photographers you admire do. I have made mistakes (plenty of them) I made a second edition of 20x24's numbered to 25 with my first #'ed to 50. Now I wish it was one edition. Hell I'm learning the game too and there is a lot too it. Regarding savvy investors, there like big corporate clients, cheap! First thing they do is pose as Architects, designers, etc., and ask for a trade discount 15-25% the discount is almost always given, split between the gallery and artist. The savvy investor bets his money on a possible rising star, or takes advantage of a dealer artist who don't know what they have. Like great work just starting out. It wasn't very long ago that Michael Kenna Prints went for 750, now they start at 1500.00 and are sold out almost before his shows finish touring the country. These are 8x10's!Most of the Photography I see in galleries is over priced some probably worth it, I have my eye on a 3000.00 piece ;0) but the good news is crap doesn't sell at any price and there is a lot of out there. Galleries, investors, are all taking gambles there are no sure things, just instinct. I'm sure you've noticed what the entry level gallery prices are, usually 450-1000 and a little bit more for larger prints, Success at that level, about 3 years, leads to the 1500-2000 range and so on. I seen great entry level work priced @1500.00 only to get skunked because no one knew who the artist was. Hell, another 500.00 can buy you tons of name photographers. My point, hell I don't no ;0) Basically savvy investors look for good work at bargain basement prices. I do know I have an image close to a sell out at 50 and I will retire it at that number no more of any size. Looks good when shoppers see that there have been sell outs. Some thoughts and rambles thats all! Steve M. Snip,>>>>> , In a message dated 11/18/2002 6:29:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, mark@... writes: > Right now, I'd say that > there are many savvy buyers/investors out there who know how > the game is played -- ie, there's always that chance that they'll > pay top dollar for a print, under the guise of a limited edition, only > to be informed later that a whole NEW edition has been > introduced "in a new color", or "in a new size". Who on this list > can look me in the eye and tell me that's not a questionable > business practice? (Whether it's done every day is no > justification, either). > > Hell, given this behavior, there's no wonder that the prices are > staying low; photographers seem to be their worst enemies. > > ----- > > I am asking ALL of these questions under the heading of: "I don't > know and I'm trying to learn", so please read them with that in > mind. I'm a commercial hack, and all this art-talk is new to me. > And, as you can see from my writing, no words are over three > syllables, so keep your responses simple. > > Thanks very much, > > MT, http://marktucker.com/ > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Editions: Another Dumb Idea...
2002-11-19 by Andrew Biggs
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.