I'll give you a couple names that are hot, hot sellers and some ideas. In the Floral Market, Ron VanDongen, (very hot, 3 books 1,000 and up I believe. David Fokos, very hot right now, 8x10 shooter Kind of like an 8x10 Michael kenna, Large prints are awesome. Black and white lightjets. Some rocks, ;0) Christopher Harris, not widely known, pinhole shooter, color, 1200.00 and up. Shows usually sell out or close to it. In the nude category, male nude are selling! The upscale gay crowd loves fine art naked men (smaller prints) are doing well. Greg Gorman sold a couple here recently very large almost full life size over 2,000 ea. Iris prints from nash editions. Those are just a couple contemporary names that are doing well that I have seen. Do Internet searches on them and you'll find there work. Steve Meyers http://www.xray-art.com In a message dated 11/19/2002 8:04:45 AM Pacific Standard Time, colson@... writes: > Here's a new/old thread. Mark, Steve, et. al. Hope you will chime in. There > have been a lot of comments about rocks and trees, mountains and streams > and, while these may be trite and more than tired, there are some beautiful > prints out there. Personally, they're not my bag, but who am I to judge? > Judging by what sells there are a lot of people out there who disagree with > me. > > On the personal side, I make some images (in fact most of them) just > because > I like them or because they mean something to me or because I find some > beauty in them or because I compelled to make them. I'm working on a series > of beds in inns, for instance. I doubt they'd have any commercial value but > they mean something to me. I also make commercial images, portraits mostly, > because I love to shoot people and it's my principal photographic income. > (I > own, for lack of a better description, a cross between an agency and a > design firm, www.ideate.com, and I'm lucky that something I love so much > also pays the bills.) I'm now starting to make images to sell as fine art > and I'm spending a lot of time thinking about (and looking around at) what > sells and what doesn't. I don't really want to do the rocks and trees > business because I don't find it meaningful or interesting. But I do want > to > shoot stuff for fine art SALE. Nudes? Too many already and most of them are > mediocre anyway although the subject has potential. What else besides the > traditional landscapes and historical imagery sells? > > Color (forgive the word) or b&w? > > I'm unwrapping the 7500 today. Where to from here? Not for my personal work > because that directs itself, but for my fine-art-for-sale work. It's a > difficult question because it's both a matter of art and commerce. > > Thanks all for your thoughts... > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1128
2002-11-20 by sdmey4@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.