Digital BW, The Print

Tony:
It is not a case of being negative toward the ink. It is the way the ink was
presented.

A post was put up about this new ink and how wonderful it was. Which is ok.
The problem was there was not supporting information. Even with all the
postings over the last five days. Still not supporting information.

Potential users get pretty bent out of shape when a manufacturer says here
buy this on my word alone. We have all been there and done that. Or as Harry
Truman once said, "the buck stops here." All we are saying is "the free ride
of the manufacturers stops here." We're mad as hell and we are not going to
take it anymore.

OOPS! Sometimes I get carried away. But honestly, all we ask for is a little
consideration. Without us there is no sales. Without sales there is no
company. We will be more than glad to help any company grow if they are
willing to give us something better than we are already using.


Jim Davis
http://www.visual-artists.com
jarthurdavis@...
mail to: jarthurdavis@...
Supplier of fine art printing products



> 10.  I hope this message diffuses a little of the negative tone the list
has toward this ink.  I have absolutely no input whatsoever to  the way they
make the ink, package the ink, sell the ink (except for  me) or run the
company at all. Since none of the other users have  stepped up to the
chopping block, I thought I would.  It looks like a good ink, and I think it
has just had a rough start.
>
>
> regards,
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>