Hi Andy, > My point was that if the ultimate goal is > greyscale, I would > shoot in color, either digital or analog, and convert using the various > channel mixers, selection tools, layers and masks in Photoshop. Do you believe there is any downside to that? (I know what my answer is ;-) > I didn't see much compelling evidence either way in the two pics that you > posted as far as the scanning in greyscale or RGB goes. That is a completely different issue. That was scanning a B&W negative in grayscale vs scanning it in RGB. Again, completely different issue than you discuss above. > I am sure the numbers are all different, but I go with my eyes. And I can see a HUGE difference. You can't base your conclusion on a 100PPI web based image. The sharpness of the grayscale scan is FAR above that of the RGB scan, and that makes perfect sense. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1167>
2002-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.