David,
First I would like to correct an impression you have that is, in my honest opinion, incorrect. You say you are willing to dedicate your printer to BW printing.
PiezoBW inks deliver very "black" blacks. How black do you need? If you are considering devoting a $3,000+ printer to quad tone printing, I suggest you get sample prints and a black swatch from each ink seller or "manufacturer" and judge for yourself.
My images usually involve significant black areas on the print (about 30% of total image). Solid black. I use the PiezoBW inkset and get blacks that look like the black of a well used fireplace chimney...carbon black. Deep solid black. Blacker than night. Black as soot...black as the ace of spades.
So I believe if you are judging ink alone (and not paper/coating/ink combinations) you should not state that "Cones inks do not give a good rich black" when in fact they do. Of course you have to know how to use them, the right papers, and the right profiles. That comes with time but is in fact also easy using the Conetech profiles supplied with the software.
Steadman
----- Original Message -----
From: daviddstock@...
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:52 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] metamerism confusion
I've been reviewing all the posts on the various Epson groups
about metamerism, because I have to make a final decision
about what inkset to use in my 7000 for printing a portfolio of
black and white photographs. I have a pretty good sense of what
the discussion has been, but still have a few questions.
Like many people, I would absolutely love to be able to print
black and white images using color inks. If this is impractical
because of metamerism, I am willing to dedicate my 7000 to
quadtones, at least for now.
As I understand it, all the pigmented ink sets have some
metamerism. Epson's pigs are the worst, Generations is pretty
bad, and Cone's color piezos have little metamerism in most
situations. However, Cone's inks do not give a good rich black.
Questions:
1. Is it feasible to use Generations black with Cone's color inkset
to get better blacks? (I have seen reports of people mixing
Generations black with MIS quad inks and Cone quad inks,
which makes me optimistic. On the other hand, I have seen
reports that adding any Generations black ink causes noticeable
metamerism to appear.)
2. Is there any other way to print grayscale images using
long-lasting color inks without getting strong metamerism or
weak blacks?
3. Why is metamerism not a problem with quadtone inksets that
have pigments in them? (Especially when folks use Generations
black in the mix...)
Thanks in advance for any help.
--David Stock
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] metamerism confusion
2001-09-11 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.