ooh.........pretty harsh! All I ask is: If you are proven wrong, you will apologize, ok? Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC pete baydar wrote: > re: > >Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:43:17 -0000 > >From: "Tony Caltabiano" <calpen1@...> > >Subject: Re: another ink option > > > >Todd, > Yes, these are pure pigments - they are very finely > ground and are > >running thorugh Iris printers in testing right now > from what I understand. > > Well this is going too far with us. This type of > unbelievable statement makes all of your other claims > seem as doubtful and equally ridiculous. Anyone who > knows anything about Iris printers knows that Iris > printers can not pass Epson compatible pigment inks > for at least 5 reasons= viscosity /conductivity > /droplet formation /filtration /pump friction. > > We may be black and white printers in this group, but > that doesn't make us stupid or gullible. Would you > please take your overenthusiastic and indellible hype > back to the list which you came from. > > > Pete > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] another ink option rumor mill
2001-09-11 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.