Digital BW, The Print

Because they could get into legal problems claiming the EAM paper was
"Archival", when it was not. The paper is the same.

Jerry



> I am not really trying to be flippant...OK maybe a little, but there is alot
> of crap in the form of unsubstantiated claims that goes around on
> websites....why should we, the unknowing, believe you?
> 
> >From a cost and marketing perspective, why would Epson go to the substantial
> cost and  risk product confustion, as evidenced here, to simply rename an
> existing product with no new benefit?
> 
> Jerry in Houston
>