I agree, EEM is brighter white than EAM. Question is, why were we ever told these were the "same" paper? Were they the same before, but now EPSON has brightened the EEM? Or were we misled from the start? Either we were misled from the start, or our ability to depend on a given paper formulation remaining consistent enough for color management techniques to be meaningful are held suspect. Either way, it's disappointing to think we cannot get accurate information from EPSON on these issues. /eddie On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 01:50 PM, Paul Roark wrote: > I just opened my first box of letter size EEM, and it appears to be > slightly > different than any of the batches of EAM that I've had. The front and > back > are noticeably brighter white.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] EEM v. EAM
2002-12-20 by Eddie Gilbert
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.