Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Black Only (was Three Articles)

2002-12-21 by Loris Medici

Hello Clayton,

----- Original Message -----
From: <cj@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Black Only (was Three Articles)


> I can appreciate your remarks, and share them to some degree.  I hope
> my articles and enthusiasm for BO printing do not give the impression
> that I am trying to convince everyone that BO is better or that people
> should switch.  I'm only trying to raise awareness of it as an

I didn't think that way... I was just making subjective statements.

> alternative method because so many people have difficulty with the
> full ink methods and get frustrated to the point of quitting.  It's
> just too difficult right now, with too many confusing choices.  I look
> forward to the day when we can _easily_ make perfect full ink prints
> that are the color we want and don't fade or color shift.

Me too... You're not alone :)

> I am also grateful to Paul Roark and other cutting edge workers who
> are laboring at this so all the rest of us can reap the benefits.  In
> no way is my promotion of BO printing meant to be a repudiation of all
> the hard work they are doing.  I hope it is not giving that
> impression.

I didn't think that way too. Perhaps my overly strong statement (looks like
trash) made you feel that way. I should correct it by saying "I'll always
vote for a 'trash looking' photograph that has a message, tells the viewer
something or leads him/her to think, awake feelings deep inside... instead
of a 'perfect looking, technical nirvana but shallow, spiritless trash'.
Quality is a thing, but not everything...

> Incredible rendering of fine detail.  Almost makes me want to get
> back into large format.  Almost <g>.  I'm mainly a 6x7 guy.

I was shocked when had my first prints from a  $95 valued (incl. CLA)
Yashica 124G (with some fungus marks remaining between the rear elements),
they were far superior than my aspherical, apochromatic $450 -  $600 valued
modern 35mm zooms (Minolta 24-105D, 100-300D).

> Anyway, the wide variety of methods and tastes is part of what makes
> photography such an exciting and rewarding art form.

Fully agree...

Best regards,
Loris.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.