Just though I'd mention I was reading Harald Johnson's book "Mastering
Digital Printing" today...
It says:
"EEM formerly EAM"
I'm wondering if they are simply having QC problems... One person
reports the tone seems the same as their older packages, and others
report that it seems much brighter, and Paul has Spectro data to support
that..
I'm wondering if they are using more than one source for the stock
uncoated media now..?
Keith
"Just some guy," and founder of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSONx7x_Printers/
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together
guys"
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] EEM v. EAM
2002-12-24 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.