Hi Steve, When I tried scanning some BWs vs Color on a flatbed with light-back, it became quite obvious that BWs have a much greater dynamic range than color. I am now being much more successful using a Polaroid SprintScan 45 and VueScan's LogCompression with these circa 1900 glass plates. I would therefore imagine the converse true: for BW, you will need equipment with a light source that can output a wider intensity range than is probably available with a system designed primarily for Color processing in order to correctly expose BW film .... Best, Alex Orlando Fla --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@e...>" <stevek@e...> wrote: > Hi; > When I first got into this I tried that approach, having 4x5 (not > 35mm) negs made and then printing onto silver. Two different > machines at two different shops produced less than stellar results > in B&W. I found the fine detail to be too mushy to go over 11x14 > (from a 4x5 neg!) and the hightlight compression produced images > with no real sparkle. I did, however, see 35mm slides from the same > machines that looked quite good on all counts. Beats me why they > couldn't do it in B&W. > > Steve Karafyllakis > > http://www.stevekphoto.com
Message
Re: Has anyone ever tried digital negatives?
2002-12-29 by B. Alex Pettit Jr. <a_pettit_jr@yahoo.co
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.