I have been making digital negatives on an Epson 1280 and 10000 for the past year. These negatives have been made with the Epson Dyes on Pictorico OHP for Platinum printing. I have also printed digital inkjet negatives on Ilford Multigrade IV Fiber paper with good results. I use the Color Table method described in Burkholder's text, however, contrast adjustments are required. With platinum, the resulting prints are very nice, but lack the 3d glow of a fine platinum print made from a traditional negative. If you look at the print from a digital negative by itself, most people will ooh and ahh. However, when placed side by side with a tradition platinum print the print made from the digital negative has a "veiled" look. Kind of what some people speak of when comparing a resin coated silver print to a fiber base silver print. My feeling is that the problem lies in the way the inks pass and reflect light. I have looked at Burkholder's digital platinum prints. Although lovely, they lack the glow of a completely optical platinum print. My conclusion is that if I am going to spend the time and money to create a platinum portfolio, I want the best possible print quality I can get. So for now, I have decided to stick with the traditional methods of photography. On the flip side, I must say that silver fiber prints made from imagesetter negatives have lovely. If you have never done so, I would highly recommend ordering a silver gelatin fb digital print from LensWork. -Mike
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Has anyone ever tried digital negatives?
2002-12-30 by Michael J. Kravit <mjkaia@kravit.net>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.