I want to thank everyone for their very informative responses to my questions. I still have not had time to read everything carefully yet that has been posted, but I plan to, and appreciate the links. I did want to let everyone know, though, that I live in the states - we just recently adopted a child from Guatemala and my yahoo profile still reflected that, so getting supplies won't be a problem. I currently own an alps md-1300 and getting supplies is a problem, plus it doesn't work for b&w, so I am looking to replace it. Once I get time to check all the posted links hopefully my purchasing decision will become clearer. I do already own Photoshop 5.5, not sure how that compares to 7 (i run windows 2000 not mac), but all the discussions about profiles and tweeking settings I am not yet familiar with, but could learn in time. I just wanted to make the best purchasing decision at this point and can take my time learning the rest. I believe I would pick the Canon if I didn't care about b&w, mostly because I keep reading about Epsons clogged heads (I won't be printing daily) and Canon's faster speed. Then there is the pigment advantage for the epsons. But, I really like the b&w, just on an hobby level, so that will influence my decision too. Thanks again and any additional information will be very appreciated. Happy New Year everyone! Cindy Ley
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Canon S900 for b&w? or any other low cost printer recommendations?
2003-01-01 by Cindy Ley <theleys@att.net>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.