Hi Justin, > From my experience, the curved > film mounting really does help. Not only can you see even > severely curved film snap into a perfectly flat plane when you > bend the film holder in your hand, but I am getting edge to edge > sherpness I wasn't seeing when I did tests with the Polaroid and > their standard film holders; I have no experience with the glass > holders. That's very good information. Thanks! I've never had a film flatness issue with my Leafscan, and I've always wondered if it really made a difference with the Imacon. The Nikon scanners appear to have film flatness issues, because their DOF is so narrow. > The Imacon Photo model will do 35mm up to 6x18. It can do > 4x5, but it takes two passes. It would take too long to explain > here exactly how it fits, but a 4x5 will fit in the 6x18 holder and you > need to run it through the machine twice and stitch it together in > Photoshop, which is really simple. All the other Imacon models > will scan a 4x5 in one pass. Interesting. At least it supports it. > > Do you have to mount each frame individually, as in cut each > frame out of a > > strip? > > Yes, sort of. If the frame you want to scan is at the end of a strip, > you can mount that frame in the holder's window and let the rest > of the strip dangle out of the machine as it does the scan. It > really isn't as awkward as it sounds when I describe it. However > if you want to scan a neg that is in the middle of a strip, you will > need to cut it; but only one cut is necessary because it just > needs to be at the end of a strip, not necessarily an individual > frame. That would bum me out! Is that true for 35mm? I can't imaging having to have all my 35mm film cut into strips two long! Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] scanner
2003-01-01 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.