In a message dated 12/31/02 7:59:49 PM, cbabing3@... write > Well that's my initial experience with one of these printers, FWIW. If I > didn't want to produce glossy prints I might be tempted to give it up, get > an Epson and switch to pigments, although it's clear from all the > discussion on this list that pigments aren't perfect yet either. But I do > want glossy, I like the Canon speed, and I still have hopes of figuring out > > a way to manage the final tone of the print. Perhaps dialing in some sepia > > or blue tone will work. I don't expect to be doing chemical darkroom > prints again, at least not for my Christmas books, so I don't have to be as > > concerned about remaining close to the tone of chemical prints as I did > this year. > > If anyone has other experience with these printers and/or other inks, I'd > love to hear it. > > Cheers, > Kip Babington > > Hi Kip: I'm curius if you tried the black ink only setting on the S900 before doing the b&w photos using all 6 inks? The inks can be greenish on some papers(and they tend to dry down even a bit greener), but on other papers, the effect is more neutral. All the best! Andrew Darlow PS- Check out the Epson C82($150/4 inks) as an alternate choice, especially on coated watercolor papers, for very nice color and b&w prints. ------ Photography, Digital Print Consulting and Custom Editions Andrew Darlow Images International, www.andrewdarlow.com Author: Inkjet Tip of the Month Club (newsletter) To subscribe, send e-mail to: Inkjettips-subscribe@yahoogroups.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Canon S900 for b&w? - LONG
2003-01-11 by shashinka@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.