Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Canon S900 for b&w? - LONG

2003-01-11 by shashinka@aol.com

In a message dated 12/31/02 7:59:49 PM, cbabing3@... write
> Well that's my initial experience with one of these printers, FWIW.  If I 
> didn't want to produce glossy prints I might be tempted to give it up, get 
> an Epson and switch to pigments, although it's clear from all the 
> discussion on this list that pigments aren't perfect yet either.  But I do 
> want glossy, I like the Canon speed, and I still have hopes of figuring out 
> 
> a way to manage the final tone of the print.  Perhaps dialing in some sepia 
> 
> or blue tone will work.  I don't expect to be doing chemical darkroom 
> prints again, at least not for my Christmas books, so I don't have to be as 
> 
> concerned about remaining close to the tone of chemical prints as I did 
> this year.
> 
> If anyone has other experience with these printers and/or other inks, I'd 
> love to hear it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kip Babington
> 
> Hi Kip:

I'm curius if you tried the black ink only setting on the S900 before doing 
the b&w photos using all 6 inks?   The inks can be greenish on some 
papers(and they tend to dry down even a bit greener), but on other papers, 
the effect is more neutral.

All the best!

Andrew Darlow

PS- Check out the Epson C82($150/4 inks) as an alternate choice, especially 
on coated watercolor papers, for very nice color and b&w prints.

------
Photography, Digital Print Consulting and Custom Editions
Andrew Darlow Images International, www.andrewdarlow.com
Author: Inkjet Tip of the Month Club (newsletter)   
To subscribe, send e-mail to: Inkjettips-subscribe@yahoogroups.com




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.